Sunday, July 27, 2014

Digital marketing-- My expectations have already been changed

First, I'd like to say this is my first-ever blog-post! So this digital class is off to a good start by making me learn by doing.

Introduction
This post will accomplish three things: 1) outline my objectives for the class, 2) reflect on insights learned during week 1 and how they might influence my original objectives, 3) reframe my objectives for the course, taking into account some of the learnings.

Original Objectives
The reason I was interested in this course was that I am interested in brand management. As a potential future brand manager, I want to better understand the tools available to digitally market a brand, particularly since this is becoming an increasingly important part of a marketer’s toolkit. In particular I was looking to understand:
  • ·         What tools exist
  • ·         What are their strengths/weaknesses
  • ·         How a brand manager could leverage them and avoid their pitfalls

Insights
The materials covered this week demonstrate that some of my original objectives—while well-intention-ed—can be modified to help me get more out of the class.

Realization #1: While it is important to be aware of changing digital tactics, this is not the most important takeaway I should expect to get from this course. In particular the “Made to Engage” and “The New Conversation” articles mentioned that the digital transition has bigger implications than just new tactics. For example, the digital transition fundamentally changes how consumers interact with companies (“Made to Engage”). Therefore the best questions might not be, “Which digital tactic gets me the best ROI?” but rather “How do I need to fundamentally change my business model to remain relevant due to changes in technology?”. Already I am seeing that the scope of this class can be more than just learning more about how email-marketing or social media can be leveraged to promote a product.

Realization #2: One of my assumptions going into the class was that digital marketing is somehow different. While this may indeed be the case, I still think many of the marketing principals are the same in digital technology as they are in other types of marketing. Whether we are talking about 4P’s framework or a 6V’s framework, there are certain marketing fundamentals that will not change (“Made to Engage”). For example—regardless of what acronym you use, it will always be important to think about your customer’s needs and how to deliver something of value to them. Therefore, instead of focusing on just what makes digital marketing different, I should consider the range of similarities and differences across different types of marketing.

Realization #3: The third insight of the week is not related to my objectives but is fundamentally important to how digital technology is impacting marketing. As both the “Made to Engage” and “The New Conversation” articles mention, the balance of power between consumers and marketers has fundamentally shifted. Digital technology has created a world of increasing choices for consumers, and with choice comes power. As “Made to Engage” notes, consumers can choose whether or not to listen to you and have increasing access to information about your product and competitor’s products. This fact is both scary and exciting for marketers. It is scary because poor marketing will be extremely ineffective. It is exciting because if you can get the marketing right—you will have the chance to have an extremely meaningful interaction with a consumer.

New objectives
In summary, to refine my approach to the class, my goal is not to master every digital technology out there but rather to gain knowledge by:
·         Compiling key digital technology frameworks, themes, and concepts that can help me interpret the existing technologies and their importance
·         To expose myself to a number of key technologies (as mentioned in the syllabus, an “immersion into the whirlwind of developments”)
·         To become aware of the most useful resources that I can continue to use to learn about new technologies to remain relevant
·         To leverage studies of the past and how things used to work (and how they work now) in order to be able to better anticipate future developments[i].

Readings list
·         “Made to Engage”
·         “Business Model Generation”, Section 1- Canvas
·         “Secrets of Engaging Customers in Online Communities”- Forbes article
·         “Do you trust this Face”- GQ
·         “Does the Internet make you dumber”
·         “Does the Internet make you smarter”
·         “Hype Cycles 2013 Emerging Technologies Report”
·         “The New Conversation”



[i] (I found some of the historical reviews of technology and marketing interesting context, as some of the things that you take for granted now were not always that way and will not always be that way (“Do you trust this face”, “The New Conversation”, “Made to Engage”). Reminding yourself of this helps you to think creatively about what could be, versus focusing on what might be.